To the enviro-wakos, you can’t just ignore enough history to make your claims look valid. You people that believe this, I want to know, what is it that makes you willing to associate yourself with literal glittering jewels of colossal ignorance? The UK Times just reported that, quote “Walking does more than driving to cause global warming, a leading environmentalist has calculated. Food production is now so energy intensive that more carbon is emitted, providing a person with enough calories to walk to the shops than a car would emit over the same distance. The climate could benefit if people avoided exercise, ate less, and became couch potatoes.”

This is not a faith-based topic. This is science, this is fact, and it is not up for a vote or consensus as Algore would like to think. There have been some 530 climatologists in 27 countries consulted on the matter, and only 56% of them agreed that climate change is mostly the result of man-made causes. 56% doesn’t make it fact, it makes it a majority of the “voters” … but in science you don’t get to vote a hypothesis true or false.