Do activists think they can just say or claim anything they want to without having to have facts or a basis to make their claims? I keep hearing environmentalists go on and on about “global warming,” that we’re in the hottest times in history, that we’ve had more natural disasters than any time in history, blah, blah, blah.
Does their account of history only go back as far as their lifetime? Believe it or not, history does go beyond your day of birth. It goes back quite a ways as a matter of fact.
I recently read this:
Reuters predicts that “global warming will set in with a vengeance after 2009, with at least half of the five following years expected to be hotter than 1998, the hottest year on record.” The environmentalists have used 1998 as the focal point of their theory for years, however NASA has corrected their temperature findings. 1998 is no longer the hottest year on record. Four of the top ten hottest years on record are from the 30s. 1934 is the hottest. This blows the lid off the entire global warming hoax, but don’t expect to see it reported anywhere.
Popularity: 15% [?]
I am a regular reader of your article. And I am very impress with your blog upon Global Warming. Now I am also write a blog upon effects and causes of Global Warming. This blog is collection of news & reviews like the study found that global warming since 1985 has been caused neither by an increase in solar radiation nor by a decrease in the flux of galactic cosmic rays. Some researchers had also suggested that the latter might influence global warming because the rays trigger cloud formation.
By the way, a little quick question here. What was the top US natural disaster? What’s the top US natural disaster, the greatest? The 1900 Galveston hurricane, 8,000 dead. The second greatest natural disaster, the 1936 heat wave, the Dust Bowl, 5,000 dead. The third greatest US natural disaster, the great Okeechobee hurricane, 2500 dead, 1928. The fourth greatest US natural disaster, the Johnstown flood in Pennsylvania in 1889, 2200 dead. And the fifth greatest US natural disaster, Louisiana hurricane of 1893, before they were named, 2,000 dead. The top five greatest US natural disasters, 1990 and prior.
To the enviro-wakos, you can’t just ignore enough history to make your claims look valid. You people that believe this, I want to know, what is it that makes you willing to associate yourself with literal glittering jewels of colossal ignorance? The UK Times just reported that, quote “Walking does more than driving to cause global warming, a leading environmentalist has calculated. Food production is now so energy intensive that more carbon is emitted, providing a person with enough calories to walk to the shops than a car would emit over the same distance. The climate could benefit if people avoided exercise, ate less, and became couch potatoes.”
This is not a faith-based topic. This is science, this is fact, and it is not up for a vote or consensus as Algore would like to think. There have been some 530 climatologists in 27 countries consulted on the matter, and only 56% of them agreed that climate change is mostly the result of man-made causes. 56% doesn’t make it fact, it makes it a majority of the “voters” … but in science you don’t get to vote a hypothesis true or false.